2015-09-04 02:29 PM
We have been using the snort parsing in our environment with great success but one issue we are running into is the volume of rules we have running is clogging up our risk.info category. While we're working through some tuning, one of my analysts wanted to know if it was possible to put the rules into a dedicated category rather than in the risk categories. In looking through other discussions on these forums i saw the below mappings were in place. While I'm quite comfortable looking at the snort.config file and making adjustments, these options did not seem to be available.
Is it possible to over ride these mappings?
Snort to NextGen Field Mappings
Snort Field NextGen Meta
"snort rule" threat.source
sid alert.id
classtype threat.category
message risk.*
2 - risk.suspicious
3 - risk.info
2015-09-15 04:34 AM
I'm getting the following when I try to load it..
Sep 15 08:29:40 rsadecoder nw[13934]: [Lua] [failure] LUA_ERRRUN: [string "snort.lua"]:1: '=' expected near 'lua_snort'
Sep 15 08:29:40 rsadecoder nw[13934]: [Lua] [failure] Throw in function static void nw::LuaPackage::require(lua_State*, const string&)Dynamic exception type: boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<nw::LuaError>std::exception::what: LUA_ERRRUN: [string "snort.lua"]:1: '=' expected near 'lua_snort'[boost::errinfo
Sep 15 08:29:51 rsadecoder nw[13934]: [Snort] [info] Loaded snort.rules, full 405, parital 12454, failures 962
Correction! - Helps if I copy your text correctly!
2015-09-15 05:53 AM
Check to make sure the copy/paste was done correctly. It appears to be an error in the first line.