2019-01-23 10:28 AM
Dear All,
We have 5 Fortigate firewalls and one FortiAnalyzer, currently the firewalls send their logs into the FortiAnalyzer.
No we want to integrate the five firewalls into our RSA SIEM, question is:
Is it recommended that we integrate the five firewalls into our SIEM or integrate only the FortiAnalyzer (which receives the logs from the five firewalls) into our SIEM is better? Please confirm and if there is a document for confirming it will be great.
Looking forward to hearing from you
Best regards,
Haitham
2019-02-09 09:16 PM
Hello Haitham
There is no official document recommending either way, it all comes down to your personal preference.
Here are some thoughts you may consider when deciding.
If the FortiAnalyzer is able to handle receiving logs from the 5 Fortigate firewalls, and also relaying those logs to RSA NetWitness. If NetWitness is successfully parsing (as device type fortinetmgr) all those logs to your satisfaction, then there is no need to change.
If however the logs are not completely parsed by NetWitness, then do a test sending the Fortigate firewall logs to be parsed by the fortinet parser, and see if it is better.
If the amount of traffic on the network is too much, or the load on the FortiAnalyzer is too much for it to cope, then consider having the Fortigate firewalls send their logs direct to NetWitness. You then also have the option of spreading the Fortigate firewalls traffic to different NetWitness Log Decoders or VLCs, to spread the load in NetWitness.
Remember not to duplicate the same firewall logs in NetWitness by sending syslog from the FortiAnalyzer + the the same from the 5 Fortigate firewalls.
Reference: https://community.rsa.com/community/products/netwitness/parser-network/event-sources#F
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer supported version=5.x device parser=fortinetmgr Syslog Firewall, latest RSA Live release=12Oct2018
Fortinet FortiGate supported version=2.8, 3.0, 4.0 MR1, 4.0 MR2, 5.x device parser=fortinet Syslog Firewall, latest RSA Live release=30Jan2019
2019-02-11 11:27 AM
Also keep in mind Fortinet is one of the vendors that seems to change its logging formats with each code update. If the log format from FortiAnalyzer is more stable than from the firewalls direct then I might choose that route.
The odds that firewalls direct to NW will have altered format on code updates and break parsing is quite high with Fortigate (and then you need to wait for RSA to update the parsing to account for the change in format in the parser, QA and roll it out to all customers).
Some other considerations to know about with Fortigate specifically.